In case of litigation, the Parties hereby agree that the venue of each action as the Proper Court of Makati to the exclusion of others. 8ĬCC filed a Motion to Dismiss 9 dated December 17, 2009, averring that paragraph 6 of the "CONTRACT (Construction of Typical Housing Units)" 10 (Contract) under the title SPECIAL PROVISIONS states:Ħ. PPC also sued People's General Insurance Corporation (PGIC), which issued the bonds in favor of CCC to guarantee the performance of PPC's obligations, to exculpate PPC from any liability under the bonds since PPC intended to prove that it was not at fault in the performance of its obligations under the construction contract. 09-0450 and assigned to the Regional Trial Court, Branch 257 of Parañaque City (RTC). 6 The case was docketed as Civil Case No. The Petition alleges that on December 1, 2009, PPC filed a Complaint 5 for sum of money against respondent Century Communities Corporation (CCC) in the amount of ₱6.7 million for unpaid progress billings in connection with a construction contract where PPC agreed to deliver 210 housing units at "Canyon Ranch" in Cavite, among others to CCC at an agreed total consideration of ₱77.5 million. The 2011 Resolution dismissed the Rule 65 certiorari petition filed by petitioner Pillars Property Corporation (PPC) while the 2012 Resolution denied the motion for reconsideration filed by petitioner PPC. This is a Petition for Review on Certiorari 1 (Petition) under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court (Rules) assailing the Resolution 2 dated Decem(2011 Resolution) and Resolution 3 dated Ma(2012 Resolution) of the Court of Appeals 4 (CA) in CA-G.R. PILLARS PROPERTY CORPORATION, Petitioner vs.CENTURY COMMUNITIES CORPORATION, Respondent
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |